Skip to content 
Alright, folks. Let’s be real — when someone mentions a “war film,” your mind probably jumps to scenes of soldiers reminiscing about home, a patriotic soundtrack swelling in the background, and maybe a tearful letter reading under moonlight. Warfare is not that movie.
This isn’t a film about why war happens — it’s about what it feels like to live through it. If you’re into unfiltered, pulse-pounding realism and stories that don’t spoon-feed you emotions, strap in. This one’s for you. Let’s dive into the Warfare Movie Review.
About the Film
Directed by Alex Garland and co-written with Ray Mendoza, Warfare is a deeply personal gut punch of a movie. Mendoza isn’t just a screenwriter — he lived this. His experiences as a Navy SEAL support team member in Iraq form the raw bones of this story.
And get this: Mendoza is even portrayed in the film by Deferro Wunatai, while the rest of the cast embodies real people from Mendoza’s team. Authenticity? Maxed out.
Rating: (3.8/5)
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Title | Warfare |
| Release Year | 2025 |
| Genre | War, Drama, Realism |
| Director | Alex Garland |
| Writers | Alex Garland, Ray Mendoza |
| Based On | True events from Ray Mendoza’s life |
| Main Cast | D’Pharaoh Woon-A-Tai, Will Poulter, Cosmo Jarvis |
| Runtime | Approx. 100–120 minutes (unconfirmed) |
| Language | English |
| Platform | Theatrical release |
The Setup: No Heroes, No Villains—Just War
- A Different Kind of War Film:
Forget flag-waving montages and geopolitics. Garland and Mendoza don’t bother with the “why” of war. They zero in on the “what now?” They shove us directly into the mud alongside these soldiers — no context, no cutaways, just the heat of the moment. And honestly, that makes Warfare hit harder than most.
- No Glory Shots, Just Grit:
You won’t find teary-eyed monologues or philosophical debates here. Nobody’s questioning their orders. No one is sitting under the stars wondering if they’ll make it home. Instead, we get anxiety-inducing silence. Twitchy eyes scanning rooftops. Soldiers waiting for something to go horribly wrong — and then it does.
- A Day in the Dirt:
The story unfolds almost entirely in real time. No multiple locations. No cross-cutting subplots. Just one painfully intense, unrelenting day. The tension builds slowly — soldiers waiting around, watching civilians gather, getting more uneasy by the minute. And then violence strikes. Fast. Brutal. Shocking.
That single moment that splits the movie in half? It hits like a sucker punch. You’ll feel it in your chest.
- Characters That Don’t Try To Be Heroes:
The ensemble cast isn’t here to play macho. These actors breathe life into their characters without a hint of cliché.
Deferro Wunatai plays Mendoza with a quiet strength — not a spotlight-stealer, just part of the squad. That restraint speaks volumes about Mendoza himself, who could’ve easily made himself the star of his own story but chose authenticity over ego.
- Not Your Average Soldiers:
Each performance is full of nuance. No one’s chewing the scenery here. Instead, we watch people try (and sometimes fail) to hold themselves together under unthinkable pressure. You feel the weight of their exhaustion, fear, and moral compromise. It’s subtle, but it sticks.
Standout Performances
- Will Poulter is phenomenal as the unit’s commander. He captures the slow psychological burn of leadership under fire — the kind of wounds that don’t bleed but linger forever.
- Cosmo Jarvis and Joseph Quinn also bring heavy emotional depth. Every twitch, every glance feels deliberate and earned. This is acting that hurts — in the best way.
Realism That Hurts:
This movie doesn’t rely on jump scares or loud booms to startle you. It relies on reality. The danger is always there, simmering. And when it finally explodes, it’s messy, terrifying, and raw.
Documentary Vibes
- Sound That Cuts Deep: Let’s talk about the sound design — because wow. It’s not just background noise. Every bullet, every explosion feels like it matters. It’s sharp. Jarring. Sometimes deafening. Other times, dead silent. That silence? That’s when it’s scariest.
- Themes That Haunt: Warfare doesn’t scream, “war is bad!” or “war is noble!” It doesn’t need to. It just shows you the cost — in sweat, blood, and fractured souls. You’ll see brave men doing necessary things and those same men making horrifying choices. It’s not a judgment. It’s a reflection.
- War Without the Flags: No slow-mo flag-waving. No victorious score swelling in the final act. This movie ends in confusion and dust, not glory. And that’s the point. Sometimes, there is no clear winner — just survivors.
Recommended: Black Mirror Season 7 Review
Comparison to Alex Garland’s Civil War
If you’ve seen Civil War, this feels like its grim cousin. Both lock you into conflict without commentary, trusting you to make sense of it.
But Warfare might even be more grounded. More personal. Where Civil War was speculative, this is all too real.
The Good vs. The Bad
| The Good | The Bad |
|---|---|
| Unfiltered, raw realism | May feel too intense for sensitive viewers |
| Outstanding performances by ensemble cast | Lacks traditional storytelling structure |
| Immersive cinematography and sound design | No clear resolution or emotional payoff |
| Honest portrayal of soldiers in combat | Slow pacing in early scenes |
| No glorification — just truth | Not for casual or patriotic war film fans |
| Minimalist approach enhances the intensity | Absence of context might confuse some |
Final Verdict Of Warfare Movie Review
So, should you see it?
Warfare isn’t a “fun” watch, but it’s a necessary one. It’s Black Hawk Down stripped of Hollywood bravado, Saving Private Ryan without the sentimental bookends. Clocking in at just under two hours, it’s a relentless, nerve-shredding experience that’ll leave you gasping for air.
Who’ll Love It:
- Fans of Civil War’s immersive chaos
- Viewers craving war films without propaganda
- Anyone who thinks sound design deserves Oscars
Who Might Not:
- Folks seeking clear moral takes
- Those triggered by graphic violence (seriously, this is intense)
- Audiences who prefer traditional three-act structures
If you’re looking for something emotionally honest, brutally realistic, and performed with heart — yes. Absolutely. But if you want a feel-good, patriotic popcorn flick? This ain’t it.
This is a film that leaves you sitting in your seat when the credits roll — processing.
Conclusion
Warfare is not here to entertain you. It’s here to make you feel something. It’s not about war. It’s about being in war — the confusion, the pain, the fear. And it’s easily one of the most powerful films of 2025 so far.
FAQs
Q1. What makes Warfare different from other war films?
Unlike traditional war films, Warfare skips the heroics and dives into the realism of combat. It’s less about plot, more about presence.
Q2. Is Warfare based on a true story?
Yes. Co-writer Ray Mendoza lived through these experiences in Iraq in 2006, and the characters are based on real people.
Q3. Is the film graphic or disturbing?
Absolutely — but not in a gratuitous way. The violence is raw and necessary to the story’s authenticity.
Q4. How does it compare to Civil War (2024)?
Both share a grounded, immersive approach. But Warfare feels even more personal and intimate, given its real-world roots.
Q5. Who should avoid watching Warfare?
Anyone uncomfortable with intense realism, sudden violence, or emotionally heavy themes may want to sit this one out.
